Business Relationship in Business Process Management and Management with the Literature Review Method

Sudadi Pranata; Katno Hadi; Mochamad Heru  Riza Chakim; Yamato Shino; Ihsan Nuril Hikam

doi:10.34306/ajri.v5i1sp.912

Authors

Sudadi Pranata Catur Insan Cendekia University
Katno Hadi Universitas Borobudur
Mochamad Heru Riza Chakim University of Raharja
Yamato Shino University of Miyazaki
Ihsan Nuril Hikam University of Raharja

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34306/ajri.v5i1sp.912

Keywords:

Business, Lean, Management, Literature Review

Abstract

In an increasingly globalized and digitized environment, businesses face various challenges. Rising costs, intense competition, rapidly evolving technology, increasingly demanding and privileged consumers, and the demands of a socially changing society. In this respect, the effectiveness and efficiency of the operation of the business organization are realized. This article addresses the following fundamental scientific questions at a theoretical level: How important is Business Process Management (BPM) concerning Quality Management (QM)? Is BPM the QM axis? The relationship between business process management and quality management needs to be studied more interdisciplinary. This study aims to build this relationship. The research methods used are literature review and critical analysis of scientific sources. Academic papers and other sources published within two years (2021–2022) were analyzed to look for research findings on the relationship between BPM and QM. The results show confusion and overlap between different QM and BPM paradigms. The BPM paradigm can be considered an integral part of almost every primary quality management paradigm. BPM is like a horizontal domain that encompasses different quality management paradigms. The conclusions drawn are helpful for organizations implementing quality systems. Integrating BPM into quality management systems and tools creates the conditions for an organization to develop effectively and efficiently. A limitation of this study is the paucity of quantitative studies on scholarly sources. In the future, it may be helpful to conduct systematic literature reviews that include quantitative analyzes of scientific studies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. De Ramon Fernandez, D. Ruiz Fernandez, and Y. Sabuco Garcia, “Business Process Management for optimizing clinical processes: A systematic literature review,” Health Informatics J., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 1305–1320, 2020.

B. Zuhaira and N. Ahmad, “Business process modeling, implementation, analysis, and management: the case of business process management tools,” Bus. Process Manag. J., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 145–183, 2021.

P. Rashi, M. C. Lohani, N. Luftiani, T. Hermansyah, and I. N. Hikam, “New Personalized Social Approach Based on Flexible Integration of Web Services,” Int. Trans. Artif. Intell., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2022.

V. Agarwal, M. C. Lohani, A. S. Bist, E. P. Harahap, and A. Khoirunisa, “Analysis Of Deep Learning Techniques For Chest X-Ray Classification In Context Of Covid-19,” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 208–216, 2022.

A. Baiyere, H. Salmela, and T. Tapanainen, “Digital transformation and the new logics of business process management,” Eur. J. Inf. Syst., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 238–259, 2020.

D. Apriani, A. Williams, U. Rahardja, A. Khoirunisa, and S. Avionita, “The Use of Science Technology In Islamic Practices and Rules In The Past Now and The Future,” Int. J. Cyber IT Serv. Manag, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 48–64, 2021.

M. Fischer, F. Imgrund, C. Janiesch, and A. Winkelmann, “Strategy archetypes for digital transformation: Defining meta objectives using business process management,” Inf. Manag., vol. 57, no. 5, p. 103262, 2020.

A. S. Bist, V. Agarwal, Q. Aini, and N. Khofifah, “Managing Digital Transformation in Marketing:" Fusion of Traditional Marketing and Digital Marketing",” Int. Trans. Artif. Intell., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 18–27, 2022.

N. A. Santoso and E. A. Nabila, “Social Media Factors and Teen Gadget Addiction Factors in Indonesia,” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 67–77, 2021.

E. Sulis, P. Terna, A. Di Leva, G. Boella, and A. Boccuzzi, “Agent-oriented decision support system for business processes management with genetic algorithm optimization: an application in healthcare,” J. Med. Syst., vol. 44, pp. 1–7, 2020.

Q. Aini, M. Budiarto, P. O. H. Putra, and U. Rahardja, “Exploring e-learning challenges during the global COVID-19 pandemic: A review,” J. Sist. Inf., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 57–65, 2020.

T. Subrata, D. A. Yanto, A. Rizky, I. N. Hikam, and H. J. Situmorang, “Implementation of the Tableau Application to Determine Earthquake Prone Areas with Geolocation Features,” in 2022 IEEE Creative Communication and Innovative Technology (ICCIT), 2022, pp. 1–6.

S. Richard, R. Pellerin, J. Bellemare, and N. Perrier, “A business process and portfolio management approach for Industry 4.0 transformation,” Bus. Process Manag. J., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 505–528, 2021.

W. Bandara, G. G. Gable, M. Tate, and M. Rosemann, “A validated business process modelling success factors model,” Bus. Process Manag. J., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1522–1544, 2021.

R. Muthia, “Structured Data Management for Investigating an Optimum Reactive Distillation Design,” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 34–42, 2023.

R. E. Santoso, A. G. Prawiyogi, U. Rahardja, F. P. Oganda, and N. Khofifah, “Penggunaan dan Manfaat Big Data dalam Konten Digital,” ADI Bisnis Digit. Interdisiplin J., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 88–91, 2022.

E. Guustaaf, U. Rahardja, Q. Aini, H. W. Maharani, and N. A. Santoso, “Blockchain-based Education Project,” Aptisi Trans. Manag., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 46–61, 2021.

M. I. Cagnin and E. Y. Nakagawa, “Towards dynamic processes-of-business processes: a new understanding,” Bus. Process Manag. J., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1545–1568, 2021.

V. Javidroozi, H. Shah, and G. Feldman, “A framework for addressing the challenges of business process change during enterprise systems integration,” Bus. Process Manag. J., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 463–488, 2020.

H. Tussa’diah and N. Y. Kartika, “Critical Discourse Analysis on Linguistic Ideology of The Netizens Comments,” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 110–121, 2023.

P. Renna, C. Izzo, and T. Romaniello, “The Business Process Management Systems to Improve the Performance of Universities: Integrated Performance Plan,” in Handbook of Research on Operational Quality Assurance in Higher Education for Life-Long Learning, IGI Global, 2020, pp. 56–80.

M. Bilal and E. Andajani, “Factors Affecting the Intention to Use Roof Solar Panel in Households in Indonesia,” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 25–33, 2023.

N. Lutfiani, F. P. Oganda, C. Lukita, Q. Aini, and U. Rahardja, “Desain dan Metodologi Teknologi Blockchain Untuk Monitoring Manajemen Rantai Pasokan Makanan yang Terdesentralisasi,” InfoTekJar J. Nas. Inform. Dan Teknol. Jar., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 18–25, 2020.

J. Erasmus, I. Vanderfeesten, K. Traganos, and P. Grefen, “Using business process models for the specification of manufacturing operations,” Comput. Ind., vol. 123, p. 103297, 2020.

L. S. Rosa, T. S. Silva, M. Fantinato, and L. H. Thom, “A visual approach for identification and annotation of business process elements in process descriptions,” Comput. Stand. Interfaces, vol. 81, p. 103601, 2022.

U. Rahardja, “The Economic Impact of Cryptocurrencies in Indonesia,” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 194–200, 2023.

R. N. Syafroni, “Field of Meaning Theory in Celebgram Endorsement Product Captions,” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 172–183, 2023.

A. Nkomo and C. Marnewick, “Improving the success rate of business process re-engineering projects: A business process re-engineering framework,” South African J. Inf. Manag., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2021.

R. N. Sari, A. Pratadina, R. Anugerah, K. Kamaliah, and Z. M. Sanusi, “Effect of environmental management accounting practices on organizational performance: role of process innovation as a mediating variable,” Bus. Process Manag. J., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1296–1314, 2021.