CERTIFICATE S4
Editorial Policies
Editorial Policies
- Focus and Scope
- Section Policies
- Peer Review Process
- Publication Frequency
- Open Access Statement
- Archiving
- Publication Ethics
- Editorial and Publishing Process
- Author Fees
- Indexing
- Screening for Plagiarism
- Self-Archiving of Papers Published Open Access
Focus and Scope
ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) accepts articles in any technology related subjects and any research methodology that meet the standards established for publication in the journal. The primary, but not exclusive, audiences are academicians, graduate students, practitioners, and others interested in information system research.
The primary criterion for publication in ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) is the significance of the contribution an article makes to the literature in technology area, the significance of the contribution and on the rigor of analysis and presentation of the paper. The acceptance decision is made based upon an independent review process that provides critically constructive and prompt evaluations of submitted manuscripts. ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) invites manuscripts in the areas :
1. Management Information System
2. E-business
3. International Business
4. Technology and Entrepreneurship
5. Computer Science/informatics
6. Computer engineering/computer systems
7. Information Systems
8. Artificial Intelligence
9. Data Science
10. Software Engineering
11. Blockchain
Peer Review Process
ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) utilizes Double-blind Review Process for each submitted paper. Please see Editorial and Publishing Cycle for detail on our Peer-Review Policy.
No |
ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) Journal document |
1. |
Articles that are accepted for processing are articles that comply with the specified journal writing framework, which can be found here for more details |
2. |
Articles that are accepted for processing are articles that have met the journal checklists, for more details, see here |
3. |
The article review process is divided into 2 stages, review by editor and review by reviewer |
4. |
The review process by the Editor will involve checking the article writing where the only approved articles are written in accordance with the template |
5. |
After the article review process by the editor then the article will be processed again to be scanned (plagiarism scan) where the articles that pass the review stage of the Editor are only articles with scanned results |
6. |
Journals that have passed the review stage by the Editor will be reviewed by 2 reviewers |
7. |
Articles will be reviewed by a reviewer for a maximum of 14 days of work |
8. |
Reviewer's assessment process is fully based on the reviewer's assessment |
9. |
The revision process from reviewers is no later than 7 days after the review results are sent |
10. |
Submissions of revisions that exceed the specified limit will be automatically rejected |
11. |
Articles must be original with a plagiarism rate of <25% |
Publication Frequency
The ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) issues will be published twice a year, every March and September. The submission of a draft of the paper work is welcome anytime, and will be published in the upcoming issue. Every issue there will be 10 papers. In one year, there will be 20 papers.
Open Access Statement
ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) publishes fully open access journals, which means that all articles are available on the internet to all users immediately upon publication. AJRI has compile with standar citation I4OC, and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International.
- Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially.
- Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
-
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
-
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
Archiving
This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration.
Publication Ethics
ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) is a peer-reviewed open-access journal. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer and the publisher Pandawan Sejahtera Indonesia. This statement is based on the previous COPE’s Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors and the current COPE's Core Practices.
Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication
The publication of scholarly articles in the Journal of ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI), a peer-reviewed journal, plays a pivotal role in establishing a coherent and esteemed knowledge network. This process serves as a direct representation of the authors' work and the institutions endorsing them, contributing to the advancement of scientific understanding. Peer-reviewed articles within AJRI serve as a manifestation of the rigorous scientific method. As such, it is imperative to establish and adhere to standardized ethical principles for all stakeholders involved in the publication process: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher, and the society at large.
Publisher and Editor
Pandawan Sejahtera Indonesia as publisher of Journal of ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.
Publication decisions
The editor in chief of ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The decision is based on the recommendation of the journal's editorial board members and reviewers. The journal abides by legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor confers with the editorial team and reviewers in making this decision.
Non-Discrimination
The editors and reviewers evaluate manuscripts for intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
Confidentiality
The editor, reviewers, and editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, editorial team, and the publisher, as appropriate.
Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used by any of the editorial board members and reviewers in their own research.
Duties of Reviewers:
1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions
The journal uses Double-blind review process. The reviewers advise the editor-in-chief in making the editorial decision. The editor-in-chief communicates with authors, as required, and helps them in improving quality of their research paper.
2. Promptness
The journal editors are committed to provide timely review to the authors. If a reviewer does not submit his/her report in a timely manner, the paper is immediately sent to another qualified reviewer.
3. Confidentiality
Manuscript content is treated with at most confidentiality. The journal uses double-blind process. Except for the editor-in-chief, the editors and reviewers cannot discuss paper with any other person, including the authors.
4. Standards of Objectivity
The editors and reviewers are required to evaluate papers based on the content. The review comment must be respectful of authors. The reviewers are required to justify their decision and recommendation.
5. Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
6. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
Duties of Authors
1. Reporting standards
Authors should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work wherever possible. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
2. Data Access and Retention
Authors may be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review. They should be prepared to provide such data within reasonable time.
3. Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted. Papers found with such problems are automatically rejected and authors are so advised.
4. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication
When a paper is submitted for possible publication, the submitting author makes a written statement that the paper has not been published not it is currently under publication with any other journal. Simultaneous submission is considered unethical and is therefore unacceptable.
5. Acknowledgment of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others is required. Authors must cite publications that have led to the authors’ current research.
6. Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the research reported in the manuscript. The corresponding author has a responsibility to keep co-authors posted with the review process. If accepted, all authors are required to give a signed statement that the research work is their original research work.
7. Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects
If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.
8. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
9. Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
Author Fees
ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) does charge to the author :
(1) Article Submission: 0.00 (USD), the author does not pay article submission fees as part of the submission process of articles in ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI)
(2) Article processing charges (APCs) / Article Publication: $ 200 (USD)
This journal charges the article publication fee (with PayPal processing fee, which is 8% of the amount). To support the costs of open access dissemination of research results, manage various costs associated with handling and editing submitted manuscripts. Management journals and publications in general, authors, or authors' institutions are required to pay a publication fee for each accepted article. The fee covers:
1. The standard of the first twelve (12) pages manuscript. For every additional page, an extra fee of 4 USD per page will be charged.
2. DOI registration for each paper.
3. Checking the article similarity by Turnitin; the final result will be sent to authors (by request).
4. Layout Editing according to template and journal standard.
A waiver or partial waiver of author fees may be decided by the editor in case of lack of funding, excessive length of a submitted manuscript, or other reasonable reasons provided by the author during the submission. The author should clearly declare that he asks for a waiver in the comments to the Editor box during their submission. A waiver is most likely to be denied if it is not asked in this stage. The waiver will have no effect on the review result.
Screening for Plagiarism
Manuscripts submitted to this journal will be filtered for plagiarism using ithenticate applications with a similar level of maximum 25% when published.
The submitted manuscript would be check for plagiarism using by:
Self-Archiving of Papers Published Open Access
Authors publishing open access are encouraged to deposit the final published PDF in their institutional repository or any suitable subject repository on publication. Authors should provide a link from the deposited version to the URL of the published article on the journal's website; in all cases, the requirement to link to the journal’s website is designed to protect the integrity and authenticity of the scientific record, with the online published version on the journal’s website clearly identified as the definitive version of record.